Antranova Antranova Engineering AB Systems Engineer · Field and Analysis

Services

Antranova helps organisations understand, troubleshoot and improve complex technical systems when the underlying causes are not obvious. The work combines technical experience, system analysis, calculations and simulations to create clear decision support.

When documentation, operating data or previous actions do not explain a problem, a focused investigation is often needed. Technical mapping is a concrete first step to understand causes, assess risks and recommend the next action.

  • Technical troubleshooting and root-cause analysis
  • Independent technical review
  • Technical system mapping
  • Consequence analysis before modification
  • Calculation, modelling and simulation
  • Verification and technical review
  • Training and technical documentation

Clearly defined first step

An initial assignment is tailored to the specific technical question and may, for example, consist of a technical review, targeted troubleshooting, an independent review or a smaller analysis. Scope, deliverables and price are agreed once the problem and the available information have been defined.

Investigation of hard-to-explain operational problems

A focused technical investigation to understand why a system does not perform as intended and which factors most likely affect the outcome.

A technical diagnosis can be a clearly defined first paid step, but the setup is tailored to the specific problem and does not limit what a continued assignment may cover.

The aim is to understand the problem, identify likely causes and propose next steps without starting a large project.

Deliverable: a short report with clear problem areas, likely causes and recommended next steps.

The assignment can be limited to a short review or developed into a more detailed analysis.

  • Review of documentation and system descriptions
  • Identification of critical dependencies and failure mechanisms
  • Assessment of operating problems or planned changes
  • Simplified calculations or models where needed
  • Recommended next steps for action or verification

Independent technical review

When a supplier has proposed a component replacement, a modification, or delivered a calculation or simulation model validated by the supplier itself, the organisation often needs an assessment from someone with no stake in the outcome. The review can cover calculation basis, simulation and process models, test plans and proposed actions. The client receives a traceable statement of what the material supports, what it does not support, and what additional work is needed before a decision.

Professional background in independent review

The examples below refer to previous experience. Assignments in nuclear power and power generation are not currently offered.

  • Validation and verification of a calculation code for the dispersion of radioactive substances, through systematic comparison against an established reference code. Client: regulatory authority.
  • Verification of thermal-hydraulic calculation models against experimental measurement data from international test facilities. Client: regulatory authority.
  • Independent review and assessment of proposed changes to safety-related documentation at a nuclear facility. Client: facility owner.

Technical investigations and system analysis

When operational disturbances, deviations or performance problems keep recurring, the real system behaviour must be investigated rather than inferred from assumptions alone. Inspection, measurement and reconstruction are used to understand what is actually happening.

Analysis of the interaction between flow, pressure, heat, mechanics, electrical systems, automation, control and dynamics

An in-depth analysis of how components, subsystems, operating conditions, electrical systems and control strategies affect the system's overall performance.

Thermohydraulic process analysis

Analysis of cooling systems, heat systems, pumps, valves and pipework. Pressure drop, flow distribution, transient processes, operational cases and disturbances.

Technical decision support for corrective actions and investments

An independent assessment of problems, alternatives, consequences and technical risks before the customer carries out a change or an investment.

Technical training and communication

Knowledge transfer via simplified models, simulators and documentation adapted to the recipient. Raises internal competence and reduces dependence on external support.

Identification and assessment of improvement opportunities

Analysis of possible improvements in capacity, stability, energy use, control, availability or maintenance.

Methods and tools

Depending on the nature of the problem, Antranova uses technical calculations, simplified models, dynamic simulations, data analysis and experience-based system analysis. The tools are selected according to the question that needs to be answered.

Examples of problem areas

  • Unstable flow and pump operation
  • Pressure oscillations and rapid transients
  • Temperature problems and heat transfer
  • Control and regulation problems in technical systems
  • Consequences of modification or component replacement
  • Technical dependencies between subsystems
  • Systems lacking updated or correct documentation
  • Need for independent technical review

Model fidelity – the right level for the right question

Not all analysis needs to be complex. The same question can be developed step-by-step from a simple web model to advanced thermohydraulic analysis without losing structure or comparability.

Software names in the table below are given as references to experience. The names belong to their respective rights holders. Delivery within an assignment requires that the customer provides a license, or that another tool is used.

Level
Description
Tools / environment
Complexity
Typical use
Level 1 Demo study
Browser-native models for qualitative understanding, concept exploration, pedagogy and first sensitivity assessments.
HTML / JavaScriptBrowser · no installation
Low
Rapid orientation and early decision discussions.
Level 2 Python analysis
Quantitative studies with a clear calculation chain, parameter sweeps, sensitivity analysis and reproducible results.
Python · NumPy/SciPy · JupyterNotebooks · report export · batch runs
Low–medium
Pre-studies, sizing work and structured decision support.
Level 3 OpenModelica
Equation-based multi-physics modelling with higher model fidelity, control integration and system studies.
OpenModelica · ModelicaAcausal models · multi-physics · system networks
Medium
Integrated process and control studies.
Level 4 Simulator platform
Advanced dynamic models and real-time-capable environments for operator support, training scenarios and reproduction of system and HMI behaviour.
Dynamic simulators · HMI environmentsReal-time · HIL · instructor support
High
Training, verification of operational scenarios and advanced decision support.
Level 5 Best-estimate thermohydraulics
Advanced system models for high-consequence questions where nodalisation, verification and uncertainty evaluation must be rigorously structured.
Advanced system codesTwo-phase flow · transients · uncertainty evaluation
Very high
High-consequence questions, technical decision support and particularly demanding verification.

Interpretation

Most technical questions should begin at level 1 or 2 to quickly establish reasonable assumptions, bound the problem and identify which parts truly justify higher model fidelity. Escalation to level 4 or 5 should be driven by decision consequence, training realism, technical risk or verification needs.

AntraSIM contains simulators that demonstrate level 1 in practice. Open AntraSIM →

Software names are given as references to experience. The names belong to their respective rights holders. Delivery within an assignment requires that the customer provides a license, or that another tool is used.

Technical domains

System types

  • Pump systems and flow systems
  • Cooling systems and heat transfer
  • Piping systems and HVAC-related installations
  • Industrial process systems
  • Systems with dynamic and coupled dependencies

Assignment types

  • Troubleshooting and root-cause analysis
  • Capacity and performance analysis
  • Consequence assessment for changes
  • Support for procurement or investment decisions
  • Training and competence development

Industries and application areas

The approach is applicable in operations where several technical subsystems interact and where operational problems, capacity constraints or investment decisions require a holistic assessment.

Process industry Manufacturing industry Food and beverage industry Chemical industry Water and wastewater Infrastructure systems Machine and system builders Defence Civil defence

Assignments in nuclear power and power generation are not currently offered. Previous experience in these fields is presented as professional background.

The industry itself is not the central point. What matters is that the operation is built on complex technical systems where the interaction between flow, pressure, heat, mechanics, electrical systems, automation, control and dynamics affects the outcome.

When does this fit?

  • When a system behaves unexpectedly and the underlying cause is unclear
  • When existing documentation is incomplete or outdated
  • When changes require consequence assessment and robustness analysis
  • When decisions require clear assumptions and traceable evidence
  • When the organisation needs to improve its technical understanding of a system

For consulting and engineering firms

Partner and subconsultant support

Antranova can support a concrete project as a subconsultant or specialist resource when there is a clearly defined capacity or competence need in system analysis, modelling, independent review or verification.

The assignment is defined through clear deliverables, interfaces and responsibilities. Visibility, client contact, confidentiality and the commercial model are agreed for each individual assignment.

Start an assignment

Briefly describe the system and the problem – and what type of deliverable is needed. Response with a proposed approach normally within 1–2 business days.

Download a summary of the offering as a customer sheet (PDF) →